Comments on: Google Global Domination – Dark Forces Are At Play! http://www.the-system.org/2009/06/google-global-domination-dark-forces/ The Social Media Marketing System - Search Engineering Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:47:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Andy McBurney http://www.the-system.org/2009/06/google-global-domination-dark-forces/comment-page-1/#comment-416 Andy McBurney Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:47:48 +0000 http://www.the-system.org/2009/06/google-global-domination-dark-forces-are-at-play/#comment-416 Um... Lol? If you are trying to be a zany as you can with spatial planning, you mastered it; a rambling diatribe, complete with conspiracy theories and Hitler reference. Not saying your wrong though; I just had a hard time following. One disagreement with your analysis: Central Place Theory does not suggest a hierarchy of cities, but a holarchy. Hierarchy is top-down, holarchy is bottom-up. (Atlanta does not cause Winder, GA - it's vice-versa.) This was pointed out (in different words) by Cristaller's sucessor Auguste Lusche: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/102569/central-place-theory?anchor=ref155359 Um… Lol? If you are trying to be a zany as you can with spatial planning, you mastered it; a rambling diatribe, complete with conspiracy theories and Hitler reference. Not saying your wrong though; I just had a hard time following.

One disagreement with your analysis: Central Place Theory does not suggest a hierarchy of cities, but a holarchy. Hierarchy is top-down, holarchy is bottom-up. (Atlanta does not cause Winder, GA – it’s vice-versa.) This was pointed out (in different words) by Cristaller’s sucessor Auguste Lusche: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/102569/central-place-theory?anchor=ref155359

]]>